Larry Summers Memo :: essays research papers

Larry Summers memorandaA controversy exists whether the World Bank should be encouraging migration of gloomy industries to less-developed countries. Larry Summer challenges that the World Bank should persuade such a migration. Others make do that these less-developed countries, despite their economic plight, should non be coerced into harboring dirty industries, a linear perspective I support.(A1) In his first subscriber line Summer wants to force a jerky increase in pollution, which would cause an improvement in the economy, of abase wage countries. Summer justifies his beliefs by giving an example of circumstantial as hominem. He states, Health impairing pollution should by done in the verdant with lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages. An assumption is do by Summer, where he concludes that lowest cost countries will have the trim back wages. He concludes by saying, these low wage countries should contain high pollution. The precede of Summers arg ument is assumed true, so his argument is invalid, only if strong.(C1) Many agree with Summer on his stance of high-pollution industries in lesser-developed countries. They convey that it is economic logic to fill the countries with low wages with profitable industries. By doing this, it would cause more people to want to live in a less populated area and work for higher wages. A sudden increase in population would also increase the number of the industry force. By doing this, more workers and industries would rapidly affect the growth of the economy. (R1) In terminal the first argument Summer commits to subjective fallacy when he states toss toxic waste is logical and impeccable. He develops this argument by using errors in reasoning, such as these examples. Summer also makes doubtful claims by make a personal attack on the reader. The sound out we should face up to that tells the readers they have been denying something. Summer uses this phrase to conclude his argument of p ollution dumping. (A2) In the second argument, Summers discusses his opinion of environmental issues. He states, Ive always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly under-polluted. This is clearly a subjective claim and Summers opinion. He vaguely assumes that a country could be under-polluted. The pollution of the world is not a natural occurrence the waste of man reachs it. This waste should not be pressured upon a geographical area if they do not create it. A clean and healthy environment is the only thing some(prenominal) lesser-developed countries have to cherish.